The issue of Indoor Air Quality in a home comes up very regularly for a Home Energy Auditor.
People work hard to keep their homes clean and to serve healthy food from their kitchens. We also want to know the air we breathe in our homes is healthy. There are a lot of things out there to spend our money on like, air cleaners, fancy filters, ozone and UV lights to start with.
What types of things cause a home to have un-healthy air? A recent presentation to the Indoor Air Quality Committee at the EPA used this slide from a researcher at the University of Pittsburg.
What I see as important about this list is that these are measurable. A Thermometer and a Humidity meters are commonly found in many homes. Most homes have a CO Detector for Carbon Monoxide and a lot will have a CO2 detector for Carbon Dioxide. That covers 50 percent of the items in this list.
What is left are things like small particles, Ozone, volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde. Small particles can be a tough one because we are talking really small. The standard size we look at is 2.5 microns. A human hair at 50+ microns gives one a size comparison.
The others are gaseous in nature. Much of these gases can come from materials in the home or the the furnishings and are released over time usually referred to as ‘off gassing’.
As a family lives in a home, things change. You go in and out, opening doors, windows, cooking, living, enjoying your home. How do you keep track of the air in your home? How do you know it is good, or that you may need to do something to fix a problem?
For years homes have had thermometers and humidity meters available. Now there is a whole new series of measuring instruments to monitor these various indicators. The simple detector technology for Carbon Monoxide has been improved to respond to a range of levels and actually measure the gas. The other gasses have the same technology.
NOTE: This measurement technology has been available for professionals at a significant price. Now the progress has made the units smaller and more affordable.
My friend Nate Adams has been doing some major work in existing homes. Nate works in the Akron Ohio area. He has moved his business from an Insulation Contractor to a full service home performance contractor. Recently, he has been exploring how the energy efficient features he is installing also improve the quality of the air inside those homes.
Nate has written a blog post reviewing some of these newest monitors to provide homeowners with a comparison of the available offerings.
I was challenged to write this post explaining my reaction to Nate’s Review. My initial reaction was ‘disappointing’. Nate’s challenge was ‘Why”. So here is the why.
First: While the technology for detecting has moved to measuring, it still has a ways to go. Partly technology and partly continuing to reduce the cost.
Second: There is a very limited offering. Seven Products were reviewed and three more were mentioned, but lacking the data logging feature. I was hoping for a few more.
Third: Each entry reviewed had pros and cons. I do not feel that any single item is a comprehensive monitoring solution.
Because I chose to wade through my reactions and thoughts, it has been a good exercise for me. Writing down my thoughts and reasons really helped me look at my initial response of disappointment and why my reaction should be more then that.
My second reaction after working through the above is ‘hopeful excitement’. While we may be disappointed in the number of monitors and the comprehensive coverage; we should be looking forward to the future developments and monitors that measure more.
The challenge of these developments and the potential they hold are very interesting. What can we do? What should we do? I suggest that realizing the potential is in many ways up to us. Those in contact with the public, the home owners, or renters. We need to advocate for measurement and then taking action based on what the monitors reveal.